Six masters of six swords, five turned but one stayed true. Murder has stained the clean blades designed to protect the land. When the strongest of the men fall, when there is no known hope for their world, a lone dragon and prophet are secretly hoping that the dragon's offspring will save their world. Six dragon daughters in human flesh, who have a sixth sense, through them their world must be saved.

Dantress, is the youngest of the six dragon sisters. She is the special child, she is more powerful than her sisters, she is the favorite of their father, so she never got in trouble for breaking the rules, she is the only one who can save the world. This didn't flow at all, Scott, as a male, didn't write a good female main character, I didn't connect with Dantress at all.
There are also all her sisters, even at the end of the book I still didn't know who was who. I knew Carithra was the oldest and Dantress the youngest, other than that I couldn't tell you a thing about the other sisters. The only character that was okay I felt was a minor character, Specter.
Appleton did something that drove me nuts. Swords of the Six has useless information, a lot of it. I didn't need to know the seating arrangement of the room, or the family ties of people who don't show up in the book again. Or, even though I loved the fairies, that the fairy tree has four families in it and that such and such race is unique because of blah blah blah.
Also one page is repeated three times. Like Appleton literally copy and pasted one page three times. I just skipped that page after the first time. It wasn’t a publishing error, but it did save me from reading two more pages of this book.
The plot was choppy at best, the first 100 pages had no long lasting plot. A war, girls getting raised, trip to the woods ect. I felt like in the first 100 pages at least 20 could have been cut out. The next 100 pages were the best, the girls are sent on a lone mission. They meet challenges and battled, all in all it was good. Then of the last 100 pages, at least 50 of those pages could have been cut. It was a useless battle, and background information that could have waited to be learned in the next book. There was so much filler and by product in this book that I lost track of the plot idea, it was almost non-existent.
What there was of the plot was also full of mystery and prophecies. Much wasn’t clarified. I spent pages going, "Huh? What is going on here?", "What is the point of that?", and "What just happened?". It wasn't described properly. What needed insight was left dark, and useless info was made painfully clear. Some chapters I just gave up trying to understand.
The world was the only thing that Scott got half way right, a few neat creatures, a couple interesting lands, but it was all shadowed by the rest of the book. He also had things that made me literally stop and laugh. I think hunting with swords, waffles in a fantasy land, sword fighting in dresses, learning sword fighting with sharp swords, and birds doing the dishes are just a little out there. (even for fantasy)
This book was so hard to read that I read it in 2-10 page sittings, and then I would treat myself with dessert, or a game, or another good book before I would continue reading this book. Appleton is said to have a unique writing style. True. Unique by how bad it was. I don’t know if I am going to read the next book in this series.
D
Millard · 732 weeks ago
Cson · 732 weeks ago
Jake · 732 weeks ago
James J · 732 weeks ago
kaymay · 732 weeks ago
I'm sorry you didn't like the book, but I hope this review won't prevent others from reading it. I enjoyed it immensely and look forward to the next installment.
Nathan Keeneye · 732 weeks ago
Oh and by the way, if you're gonna rip on someone's book....have the respect to spell the characters' names right. Spectator? That's not a charcter :) And get your fact straight:
If I recall, Dantress did get in trouble for breaking the rules. She was reprimanded heavily by the Living Fire and, I'm sketchy here, Albino as well.
Her character was fantastic. Scott wrote an excellent female character. Being a male writer or not is of no consequence so I'm not sure why you mentioned it.
The sisters weren't devolped as much as Dantress because they weren't main characters. However, I found no issue with this. I distinguished quite well between them after some time.
Appleton actually was very consise with his writing. Using intentional words, he told us just what we needed to know for every situation. Some details were provided to give us a glimpse into a complex and real world. A matter of opinion, yes, but what is not is that there certainly wasn't "lots" of it.
Nathan Keeneye · 732 weeks ago
My opinoin, the plot was fantastic. Incredibly new, well thought out, and faced paced.
You mentioned mystery. Most people enjoy mystery.
"I think hunting with swords, waffles in a fantasy land, sword fighting in dresses, learning sword fighting with sharp swords, and birds doing the dishes are just a little out there."
These details made the world real...
Here is my review of the book. I didn't write an indepth one but maybe I will sometime just to show how great a story it is: http://storiesfortheking.blogspot.com/2010/01/swo...
Ned · 732 weeks ago
Rachel · 732 weeks ago
Michelle Archer · 732 weeks ago
James- I am glad you liked it. :)
Kaymay- I know Tolkein is a classic, I am not. I am very modern.
"Most of Tolkein's useless information either set the character of the story itself or ended up serving a purpose later in the trilogy." So you are saying that I will need to know that some fairies are short for the next book? Why not tell me that in the next book where it is needed?
"the characters do not exist to help along the plot of the story; they exist for themselves."
huh? If they exist for themselves and don't have anything in the plot then why have them? (In my opinion)
Nathan- I'll edit the name, thanks. Dantress never got punished, just reprimanded. When I ate a candy before dinner I got spanked as a kid. Now if I did something that could have cost me my life my parents would make sure I didn't sit for a week, at least.
About that one page being used 3 times. I am sorry I didn't make this clear, it was a reoccurring dream. Appleton just copied the same page three times for the three times the dream occurred.
I enjoy mystery, I have read over 30 Sherlock Holmes, old English, when I was 12. The problem I had was that the hints weren't clear and it just wasn't explained properly.
About the "details that make the real" I was laughing at them, they are unreal. Bring me a buck that you stabbed with a sword.
Ned- "In the light of the moon a little egg lay on a leaf..." Enjoy!
I want to say, I didn't enjoy writing a negative review just this book wasn't my cup of tea, by a long shot.
Christian A Bergmann · 732 weeks ago
Michelle · 732 weeks ago
Mirriam · 732 weeks ago
jakeschollnerd 3p · 732 weeks ago
Millard · 732 weeks ago
Jake · 732 weeks ago
Nathan Keeneye · 732 weeks ago
So sorry if it didn't!
Christian A Bergmann · 732 weeks ago
whisper · 731 weeks ago
Oh, and one thing I cannot help but add: Keeneye, you said "[Dantress] was fantastic. Scott wrote an excellent female character." I'd just like to say "fantastic" is relative. I disagree quite radically. (No offense intended to Sir Appleton. I'm not saying he wrote a bad character; merely that she did not suit me.) As the commenter above me stated, "to each his own."
Heh, this is bringing to mind a comment-war that occurred a while ago on your blog, Keeneye, about the topic of strong female characters. Back I and others were hotly arguing against Dantress-like characters, while you were defending them. *chuckles* That was fun. :) I love wholesome writing-debates among the elves. http://whisperedroars.blogspot.com/2010/04/ccc-pa...
only,
-whisper
sjskogerboe 21p · 723 weeks ago
Jake · 718 weeks ago